头文字d

国台办驳斥民进党抹黑大陆信息安全_我的网站

一 |     中新网8月26日电 8月26日，国务院台办举行例行新闻发布会。    

    West Kowloon Law Courts Building in Hong Kong Photo: VCG
The anti-China group "Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China", along with its former chairman and vice-chairpersons Lee Cheuk-yan, Albert Ho Chun-yan and Chow Hang-tung, were charged with inciting others to subvert state power and have been remanded in custody since then. The local court in Hong Kong found two defendants guilty on Friday, and Ho pleaded guilty before the trial began, local media reported. 
The central government's office for safeguarding national security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) voiced support for the court's lawful prosecution on Friday, saying that the verdict demonstrates the spirit of the rule of law and upholds the authority of the National Security Law (NSL) for Hong Kong. 
The HKSAR government also welcomed the court's guilty verdict. HKSAR Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu said that for a long time, the Hong Kong Alliance had deliberately sown seeds of hatred toward the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the central government in Hong Kong society. Through various means, it sought to incite feelings of dislike and hatred toward the CPC and the central government among members of the public, and to encourage the public to subvert state power, RTHK reported. 
The defendants' long-standing conduct endangered national security, and their plot was plainly evident and had to be punished, Lee said.
Inciting subversion of state power is an extremely serious offense, he said. The HKSAR government has a responsibility to safeguard national security and will resolutely prevent, stop and punish acts and activities that endanger national security, Lee noted. 
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out how Hong Kong courts understand and apply the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, some legal experts said. 
Looking back at the case, the prosecution and defense engaged in intense legal arguments over the boundaries between freedom of expression and national security, with the core dispute going to the constitutional and legal limits under the "One Country, Two Systems" framework, Willy Fu, a law professor who is also the director of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong & Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday. 
In its closing submissions, the prosecution argued that the defendants' long-standing slogan of "ending one-party rule" was not merely a political advocacy campaign, but was essentially aimed at rejecting the leadership of the CPC and attempting to subvert the fundamental system of the state, Fu continued. 
Such conduct, the prosecution argued, went far beyond the scope of freedom of expression protected by the Basic Law and the NSL for Hong Kong, and constituted an objective act of inciting subversion of state power through "unlawful means," Fu said. 
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out the Hong Kong courts' understanding and application of the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, Chu Kar-kin, a veteran commentator based in the HKSAR and member of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday. 
Hong Kong judges likewise need to receive comprehensive and systematic education on China's national Constitution, Chu said. 
The Constitution is the fundamental law of the state and the most important component of the constitutional order of the HKSAR. The core of the constitutional order of the state is the establishment of the CPC's position as the governing party. The Preamble to the Constitution makes it clear that the leadership by the CPC is the core and foundation of the constitutional order of the PRC, a spokesperson from the HKSAR government said on Friday. 
The HKSAR is an inalienable part of the PRC. The state provides the fundamental guarantee for the prosperity and development of Hong Kong, and the highest principle of "One Country, Two Systems" is to safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests, the spokesperson said. 
The HKSAR Government will resolutely safeguard the fundamental system of the state established by the Constitution and the security of state power, and will, in strict accordance with the principle of the rule of law, prevent, suppress and punish acts and activities endangering national security with full force and in accordance with the law, the spokesperson added. 
。有记者问：公安部发布的《公安机关网络空间安全监督检查办法》将于10月1日起施行。民进党当局称，大陆正打造“由内到外、从严从密的威权法律工具链”，台湾民众赴大陆前务必审慎评估必要性，切勿低估相关人身与信息安全风险。请问对此有何评论？                         　　国台办发言人张晗表示，近日，公安部发布的部门规章《公安机关网络空间安全监督检查办法》。该办法适用于公安机关依法对网络运营者、数据处理者、个人信息处理者履行数据安全义务情况开展监督检查，并对公安执法行为予以规范。该办法制定有利于监督网络运营商、数据处理者、个人信息处理者等，加强对网络、数据和个人信息的安全保护，共同防范电信网络诈骗等违法犯罪，维护国家安全和社会公共利益。         　　民进党当局有关说法完全是造谣抹黑、混淆视听。民进党当局正是把“黑手”伸向人民生活的最大祸首，他们反复煽炒“民主对抗威权”虚假叙事，蓄意升高两岸对立对抗，阻限破坏两岸交流合作；在岛内肆意践踏民主、破坏法治、禁限自由，大搞“绿色恐怖”，近日又一再要求赴大陆探亲的台湾公务员提供亲友名单和电话等数据、要求赴大陆交流的岛内学校在陆委会网站登记等，如此肆意侵犯台湾民众个人隐私，民进党当局有何资格和颜面奢谈“信息安全”？(中新网“燕新台”工作室) 【编辑:王琴】。

Current article:http://0n1.pisezuibanzoukou.cyou/list_ukze/arbsl.html

Published on:06:55:34